Systematic Review

Term from Research Institutions industry explained for recruiters

A Systematic Review is a thorough way of gathering and analyzing all available research on a specific topic. Think of it as a very organized literature review that follows strict rules to make sure nothing important is missed. Unlike regular research summaries, systematic reviews use clear methods to find, select, and evaluate studies, making them highly trusted in fields like healthcare, social sciences, and education. It's similar to a detective carefully examining all possible evidence before reaching a conclusion. When you see this on a resume, it means the person knows how to carefully analyze large amounts of research data and draw reliable conclusions.

Examples in Resumes

Led a Systematic Review examining the effectiveness of remote learning methods in higher education

Published a Systematic Review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal on workplace wellness programs

Contributed to multiple Systematic Reviews and Evidence Syntheses for public health policy recommendations

Typical job title: "Research Associates"

Also try searching for:

Research Methodologist Evidence Synthesis Specialist Research Associate Systematic Review Specialist Research Coordinator Research Assistant Clinical Research Associate

Where to Find Research Associates

Example Interview Questions

Senior Level Questions

Q: Can you describe a challenging systematic review you've led and how you handled any difficulties?

Expected Answer: Look for answers that show experience managing large-scale reviews, resolving disagreements between reviewers, and making strategic decisions about inclusion/exclusion criteria. They should mention quality control measures and how they ensured the review's reliability.

Q: How do you ensure the quality and reliability of a systematic review?

Expected Answer: Should discuss multiple reviewers, clear protocols, quality assessment tools, bias evaluation, and methods for resolving disagreements. Should emphasize the importance of documentation and transparency.

Mid Level Questions

Q: What tools and software do you use for systematic reviews?

Expected Answer: Should be familiar with common research databases, reference management software, and systematic review tools. Should explain how these tools help organize and streamline the review process.

Q: How do you develop search strategies for a systematic review?

Expected Answer: Should explain how to create comprehensive search terms, use database-specific features, and ensure all relevant studies are captured while maintaining manageable results.

Junior Level Questions

Q: What is the difference between a systematic review and a regular literature review?

Expected Answer: Should explain that systematic reviews follow strict protocols, are more comprehensive, and use specific methods to reduce bias, unlike traditional literature reviews which are more flexible and narrative-based.

Q: What are the main steps in conducting a systematic review?

Expected Answer: Should outline basic steps: defining research question, creating search strategy, screening studies, extracting data, assessing quality, and synthesizing results.

Experience Level Indicators

Junior (0-2 years)

  • Basic understanding of research methods
  • Literature searching and screening
  • Data extraction
  • Basic quality assessment

Mid (2-5 years)

  • Advanced search strategy development
  • Statistical analysis understanding
  • Quality assessment expertise
  • Protocol development

Senior (5+ years)

  • Project management of large reviews
  • Advanced methodology expertise
  • Training and mentoring
  • Publication and grant writing

Red Flags to Watch For

  • No experience with research databases or literature searching
  • Lack of attention to detail or systematic approach
  • Unable to explain basic research methodology
  • No understanding of bias assessment or quality evaluation