ISO 26262

Term from Automotive Electronics industry explained for recruiters

ISO 26262 is an important safety standard for cars that use electronic systems and software. Think of it as a rulebook that helps make sure car electronics are safe and reliable. Just like food safety standards ensure your food is safe to eat, ISO 26262 ensures that electronic parts in cars - from backup cameras to self-driving features - work safely. When someone mentions ISO 26262 on their resume, it means they understand how to develop or test car electronics following these important safety rules. This knowledge is especially valuable as cars become more dependent on computers and electronic systems.

Examples in Resumes

Led development team in achieving ISO 26262 compliance for vehicle control systems

Performed safety analysis following ISO 26262 standards for autonomous driving features

Implemented ISO 26262 safety requirements in automotive software development

Created documentation and processes aligned with ISO-26262 safety guidelines

Typical job title: "Functional Safety Engineers"

Also try searching for:

Automotive Safety Engineer Functional Safety Specialist Automotive Systems Engineer Safety Requirements Engineer Automotive Software Safety Engineer Vehicle Electronics Engineer Automotive Quality Engineer

Example Interview Questions

Senior Level Questions

Q: How would you implement ISO 26262 requirements in a new automotive project?

Expected Answer: A senior candidate should explain the process of safety planning, risk assessment, and documentation requirements in simple terms. They should demonstrate experience in leading teams through safety compliance processes and making key decisions about safety features.

Q: Can you describe a challenging safety-related issue you resolved using ISO 26262 guidelines?

Expected Answer: Look for answers that show practical experience in solving real safety problems, ability to work with different teams, and understanding of how safety requirements affect the overall product development timeline.

Mid Level Questions

Q: What are the main safety levels in ISO 26262 and when do you use them?

Expected Answer: Should be able to explain the different safety levels (ASIL levels) in simple terms and give examples of what types of car features need different safety levels, like why backup cameras might need different safety requirements than engine controls.

Q: How do you document safety requirements for a new feature?

Expected Answer: Should demonstrate knowledge of creating clear safety documentation, working with development teams, and ensuring requirements are properly tracked and implemented.

Junior Level Questions

Q: What is ISO 26262 and why is it important in automotive development?

Expected Answer: Should be able to explain that ISO 26262 is a safety standard for car electronics and why it's important for keeping vehicles safe. Basic understanding of safety in automotive development is expected.

Q: What are the basic steps in a safety assessment?

Expected Answer: Should show understanding of basic safety assessment steps like identifying hazards, determining risks, and recommending safety measures, even if they haven't led these activities themselves.

Experience Level Indicators

Junior (0-2 years)

  • Basic understanding of automotive safety concepts
  • Familiarity with safety documentation
  • Ability to follow safety testing procedures
  • Understanding of basic risk assessment

Mid (2-5 years)

  • Safety requirement analysis and implementation
  • Creation of safety documentation
  • Conducting safety reviews
  • Working with development teams on safety features

Senior (5+ years)

  • Leading safety assessment projects
  • Making high-level safety decisions
  • Managing safety compliance processes
  • Training and mentoring teams on safety standards

Red Flags to Watch For

  • No understanding of basic automotive safety concepts
  • Lack of experience with safety documentation
  • Unable to explain risk assessment processes
  • No knowledge of automotive development lifecycle
  • Poor understanding of safety testing procedures

Related Terms