Exhibition Review

Term from Art Galleries industry explained for recruiters

An Exhibition Review is a detailed written analysis of an art show or museum exhibition that evaluates its quality, impact, and presentation. It's similar to a restaurant review, but for art displays. Art professionals write these reviews to help galleries and museums understand how their exhibitions are received, document the show for future reference, and provide feedback for improvement. This skill is especially valuable in galleries, museums, and cultural institutions where professionals need to both analyze others' exhibitions and use that knowledge to improve their own display strategies.

Examples in Resumes

Wrote Exhibition Reviews for major gallery openings in the metropolitan area

Published monthly Exhibition Review columns for local arts magazine

Conducted detailed Exhibition Reviews and visitor engagement analysis for museum programming

Typical job title: "Exhibition Reviewers"

Also try searching for:

Art Critic Gallery Reviewer Museum Critic Arts Writer Cultural Commentator Exhibition Analyst Arts Journalist

Where to Find Exhibition Reviewers

Example Interview Questions

Senior Level Questions

Q: How would you evaluate the success of a major museum exhibition?

Expected Answer: A senior reviewer should discuss multiple aspects including visitor engagement, curatorial vision, space utilization, educational value, and marketing effectiveness. They should also mention measuring attendance numbers, public response, and media coverage.

Q: How do you balance constructive criticism with maintaining professional relationships in the art community?

Expected Answer: Should demonstrate understanding of diplomatic communication while maintaining honest critique, explaining how to provide balanced feedback that acknowledges both strengths and areas for improvement.

Mid Level Questions

Q: What elements do you consider when reviewing an exhibition?

Expected Answer: Should mention layout, lighting, artwork placement, wall text clarity, visitor flow, and how well the exhibition achieves its stated goals. Should also discuss looking at context and target audience.

Q: How do you research an exhibition before writing a review?

Expected Answer: Should explain reviewing press materials, artist statements, speaking with curators when possible, and understanding the historical or cultural context of the works displayed.

Junior Level Questions

Q: What's the basic structure of an exhibition review?

Expected Answer: Should describe including exhibition details (venue, dates, artists), overview of content, analysis of presentation, and evaluation of effectiveness. Should mention importance of clear, engaging writing.

Q: How do you take notes during an exhibition visit?

Expected Answer: Should discuss methods for recording observations about artwork placement, visitor reactions, lighting, space usage, and other relevant details while maintaining professional behavior in the gallery space.

Experience Level Indicators

Junior (0-2 years)

  • Basic art writing and description
  • Understanding exhibition layouts
  • Knowledge of art terminology
  • Basic research skills

Mid (2-5 years)

  • Strong analytical writing
  • Understanding of museum practices
  • Knowledge of art history
  • Ability to meet publication deadlines

Senior (5+ years)

  • Expert critical analysis
  • Deep art market knowledge
  • Professional network development
  • Editorial decision making

Red Flags to Watch For

  • Inability to write clearly and engage readers
  • Lack of knowledge about basic art history
  • No understanding of exhibition design principles
  • Poor attention to detail in writing samples
  • Limited awareness of current art world trends